Involvement with child pornography places a person at risk for a very aggressive prosecution because the offense is both a federal and a state crime.
Minnesota law forbids anyone to have possession of pornographic work that involves children. The penalty can be five years in prison and up to $5,000 in fines for just the first offense. Sharing those pornographic images is also a felony and can constitute a 7 year prison sentence and up to $10,000 in fines. As for the production of such content, Minnesota provides a very severe punishment of 10 years in prison and $20,000 in fines.
When you are charged or investigated for the crime, it is very important to have a Minneapolis criminal defense lawyer working on your defense as soon as possible.
FIGHTING CHILD PORNOGRAPHY CHARGES
After a child pornography conviction, an individual is made to register as a sex offender. This means that personal information and a photograph are made available to the public in an online database.
Any individual within the community, such as a neighbor or a potential employer will be able to access the details. A knowledgeable and aggressive Minnesota child pornography lawyer can help you determine the most effective approach to resolving the charges against you so that this, prison time, and high fines do not have to become your fate.
As you can imagine, you will need a strong defense for these types of cases as the actions of law enforcement and investigators are going to have a significant impact on the prosecution’s case.
Anything said in email, in a chat room, and many aspects may be brought to light. But what has to be determined is if an officer entrapped the defendant. It may also be reviewed whether or not the pornographic images were deleted or saved if sent in an email. Sometimes, individuals who receive emails can be charged, but the images may not have been saved or shared.
AGGRESSIVE CHILD PORNOGRAPHY DEFENSE
It is important to show the court how a search warrant was executed or how the pornographic images were found. The reason is because a person’s rights can be easily violated. Plus, there is the fact that a single computer may have multiple users. How can it be proven that the person charged with the crime was the person behind the keyboard at the time the images were received or even sent? It is important to cast reasonable doubt on the details so that the case is dismissed or so there is an acquittal. If there is a degree of guilt, the charges, thus the penalties, can be reduced.